News and Views

In the event of Brexit, we are likely to see considerable weakness in the short term, more so in currencies than equities.  This seems pretty clear given that the sharpest moves that we are seeing on a day-to-day basis following poll data are in the currency markets not equities. On the 14 June 2016, the FTSE did drop below 6,000 for the first time since February 2016, with much of the fall attributed to Brexit fears.  The pound is likely to drop against the US dollar and the Japanese yen, with people looking to those currencies as safe havens. Europe itself perhaps has more to lose, should the UK leave, as it is possible that other countries will have to leave as well (for example Italy, Spain, France, and the Netherlands etc.) 

The future of the EU as we know it will be uncertain.

A fall of around 10-20% for sterling has been muted. John said “I think that this is a bit extreme and arguably we’ve already seen some of this fall and perhaps we could see a 5-10% fall against the US dollar and Japanese yen in the short term, but I can’t see it falling against the euro.” Brexit could well mean lower interest rates and the Bank of England may cut rates to stimulate growth. Even the US could delay interest rate hikes due to the uncertainty. John said “I doubt the reaction for the stock market will be as severe given the proportion of overseas revenues which we see in the FTSE 100. That said, a knee-jerk sell off is very likely in the immediate term.  We can expect bonds to continue to perform well as interest rate expectations are cut.  We favour government and high quality corporate bonds.”

The greatest fear for the Remain campaign is in the case of an Exit, losing access to the EU’s Single Market would threaten our export market.  The EU accounts for 44% of our exports.  If we leave, we will need to draw up new trade arrangements with the EU and other countries around the world.  However, the other side of the coin here is that the EU accounts for 52% of UK imports.  We are the second largest importer of products from Germany.  Therefore the EU is unlikely to wish to rock the boat too much by imposing tariffs and the like because it may risk them losing a crucial customer.

Currently the UK runs a deficit of £125bn on goods, which is partly offset by a surplus on services of around £90bn.  Goods, for example machinery, transportation, and chemicals, are still important and account for 56% of total exports.  If the UK were to leave the EU there would be an uncertain impact on these numbers.

Although there is a transition period of 2 years for any country leaving the EU, we would need to establish new trading models for the future period.

The primary models which we could follow are:

  1. Norway, for example, enjoys favourable agreement as part of the European Economic Area (EEA) with free movement of goods, capital, services and people in the EU, opting out of policies on agriculture and fisheries.  But this has reduced influence on regulation, there is little scope for gaining substantial extra freedoms as it will still be necessary to adopt EU rules but not all of them.  The UK would still have to pay a contribution to the EU budget, probably at a much reduced rate (but at least half of current levels, net pay £10.4bn). 
  2. Switzerland has negotiated its own bilateral agreements under the European Free Trade Association but still has to contribute to the EU budget; under this agreement there are no passporting rights for banks which would make it more expensive for foreign banks to set up local operations and UK firms cannot sell freely into the EU.  The UK could lose the ability to provide cross-border financial services and London’s leading position in financial services could be threatened as Investment Banking activities for example may be undermined.  Only partial access to Single Market (e.g. some tariffs for agricultural products).
  3. The last and worst option is the World Trade Organisation option, following the most favoured nation rules.  Here the UK would be subject to the same tariffs that the EU charges non-members.  However, global tariffs have fallen from over 8% in 1990 to around 4% today.

Because of the transition period, nothing is going to change overnight in the real economy. John said “Debt saturation and the aging business cycle are greater concerns than Brexit for me.  The trade deficit is not going to go away.” If the pound gets weaker, it will provide a short term boost to exports, provided that we can keep on trading with our partners.  There is certainly going to be uncertainty in the short term although arguably the long term prospects will be better as the UK will be free to negotiate individual trade arrangements, particularly with the likes of China and Hong Kong, rather than rely on the EU. 

Advantages to the City of London predate the EU in terms of the legal system, language, time zone, access to skilled labour so little change is expected here.  Is the Lloyd’s of London Insurance market, for example, likely to close down over night? Probably not.

Exporters to the US will benefit from a weaker pound, for example Industrials (Aerospace).  Other service based firms with a high proportion of US revenues should do well.  UK/European focused businesses are likely to perform less well. Domestic Travel & Leisure operators may do well, as more overseas visitors take advantage of a cheaper pound.

To find out more about how a Brexit would affect your portfolio, call us on 0800 877 8866.